Can anybody solve this 64 = 65 mystery?

[Neo]

I'm a bit confused with this at the moment.

mystery.gif (213.55 KiB) Viewed 8939 times

I guess this should be false. There are only few loopholes in mathematics. Basically my mind says this is impossible.

Can anybody try this to see whether this is true or false?

[Nipuna]

NO! Not Me

I don't want to be a Mad person Trying Heavy Mathematics

I have Plenty of Confusing Mathematics Problems for BIT

[Herath]

http://www.math.toronto.edu/mathnet/fal ... t1eq2.html

Could be something like this?.
Problem arises when (a^2-ab) is cancelled off from both sides without considering the possibility of a^2-ab=0.

[Face]

270163_248028951889667_100000476925959_1008424_4013942_n.jpg (31.05 KiB) Viewed 8906 times

Something like this haa? I have seen plenty of them! never tried to solve them:P

[Rksk]

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&hl=e ... TxQDjGQh-0[/media]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&hl=e ... KTCTy4UsUg[/media]

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[Chathura]

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&hl=e ... TxQDjGQh-0[/media]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&hl=e ... KTCTy4UsUg[/media]

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

second one is mathematically wrong. cannot remove (B - C- A) because it is equivalent to zero. so we cant remove that from both sides (to remove by divide the term should not be zero. divide by 0 is not defined in maths)

first one is a visual fake. try it.....
you can't see it on the video because of the line width of squares........

[Rksk]

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&hl=e ... TxQDjGQh-0[/media]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&hl=e ... KTCTy4UsUg[/media]

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

second one is mathematically wrong. cannot remove (B - C- A) because it is equivalent to zero. so we cant remove that from both sides (to remove by divide the term should not be zero. divide by 0 is not defined in maths)

first one is a visual fake. try it.....
you can't see it on the video because of the line width of squares........

Yes, yes. but others can't understand this.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[Neo]

There is a proof in complex numbers that shows 1 = 2 due to a little false step which is generally considered correct

As someone stated, those are just confusing our minds.

Lots of such things are here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_fallacy